Cited by 1,176Wildlife Ecology and ConservationCensus and Population EstimationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES

Abstract

The tiger (Panthera tigris) is an endangered, large felid whose demographic status is poorly known across its distributional range in Asia. Previously applied methods for estimating tiger abundance, using total counts based on tracks, have proved unreliable. Lack of reliable data on tiger densities not only has constrained our ability to understand the ecological factors shaping communities of large, solitary felids, but also has undermined the effective conservation of these animals. In this paper, we describe the use of a field method proposed by Karanth (1995), which combines camera-trap photography, to identify individual tigers, with theoretically well-founded capture–recapture models. We developed a sampling design for camera-trapping and used the approach to estimate tiger population size and density in four representative tiger habitats in different parts of India. The field method worked well and provided data suitable for analysis using closed capture–recapture models. The results suggest the potential for applying this methodology to rigorously estimate abundances, survival rates, and other population parameters for tigers and other low-density, secretive animal species in which individuals can be identified based on natural markings. Estimated probabilities of photo-capturing tigers present in the study sites ranged from 0.75 to 1.00. Estimated densities of tigers >1 yr old ranged from 4.1 ± 1.31 to 16.8 ± 2.96 tigers/100 km2 (mean ± 1 se). Simultaneously, we used line-transect sampling to determine that mean densities of principal tiger prey at these sites ranged from 56.1 to 63.8 ungulates/km2. Tiger densities appear to be positively associated with prey densities, except at one site influenced by tiger poaching. Our results generally support the prediction that relative abundances of large felid species may be governed primarily by the abundance and structure of their prey communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051127.x · DOI
  2. A. R. Rabinowitz, 1989 .The density and behavior of large cats in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand., Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society, 37 :235 -251 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,176

Metadata

Authors
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-12
Volume
79
Issue
8
Pages
2852-2862
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116052220
Cited by
1,176
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 67
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
tiger, population size estimation, ungulate prey, tiger poaching, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079%5B2852:eotdii%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998). ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079%5B2852%3Aeotdii%5D2.0.co%3B2